Announcement: Regarding Recent Moderation Decisions

[Nentsia]

Sorry, this seems like total bollocks to me and I wonder if these claims can be backed up by evidence. The N-word incident was dealt with, and if you claim that all that time there have been deliberations on how long the ban should be, then I wish to see evidence of these deliberations, since 2 Mods were just as surprised as I was when asked them about it. In fact, they assured me they tried but couldn't undo the ban.

Secondly, the proceedure was rather sinister. When Brum got a ban, there was a public statement, a reason for the ban, and it lasted a week. In this case, no reason was given for at least 2 days, the initial ban was to last until 2021 ( ! ), and it wasn't until unrest started to spread before the Directorate felt the need to come up with some statement that leaves a lot to be answered and casually leaves out the fact that the ban wasn't a month but 2 years.

As it stands now, for all I can see some members of the Directorate single-handedly threw out a member on the basis of a re-evaluation of past offences and tried to do so behind everyone's backs. And now we're handed some sort of explanation that doesn't add up. So pardon me for asking some concrete evidence here.

What did the Directorate discuss, and when, and why, and who was involved in it?