Thread Rating:
  • 4 Vote(s) - 3.5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
NETO Discussion Thread
#28
(10-04-2016, 04:43 AM)Eminence Wrote:
(10-03-2016, 09:12 PM)Seperallis Wrote:
(10-03-2016, 02:28 PM)Jamzor the Jaxxor Wrote:
(10-03-2016, 07:29 AM)Hadash Wrote: Kyrzbekistan is not opposed to A'Sir membership on principle, but it considered that their "olive branch" was poisoned so far. The agreement, and the fact that A'sir appeared in the treaty thread, is that Kyrzbekistan was not going to oppose A'Sir if differences were sorted out, and that meanwhile A'Sir was going to be offered some kind of observer status into NETO. But that didn't happen yet. Kyrzbekistan has a veto right and there's not a reason why we wouldn't use it until now. It's not really an issue of "keep ignoring each other within NETO", as for Kyrzbekistan the A'Sir issue is certainly a national security one.  Rolleyes  

Alright, so if Oertha also agrees that this is how it went down, then A'sir can be counted as an observer in NETO. As far as Wadiyah's membership, I don't think we ever specifically worked out the post-war process in Wadiyah, just that it was supposed to join NETO. If you want, and if Carp agrees, we can sort of retroactively institute a process whereby Wadiyah joins NETO over time as it stabilizes and gets back on its feet before becoming a full member. In the meantime it could also have an observer status.
That's fine. I originally played it off as how Med described it above, but how Hadash describes it makes more sense, and we've recently been operating under that assumption. Or at least I have. A'sir would still very much like to enter NETO completely, but I doubt that'll happen without outside pressure, and I'm sure Gharabaghi can't keep justifying the effort to his conservative base forever.  Rolleyes

In either case, regardless of the fact A'sir opposes, it would still support a mission in whatever capacity is asked of it.

Yeah mate you are fully in NETO as it is; the current members are Kyrzbekistan, Mithraina, A'sir, Khanid, Arrica, Ga'bath, Zargistan, Wadiyah.

We are now operating under the assumption that A'sir has not yet fully joined, as both Oertha and Hadash have agreed with this state of affairs.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
NETO Discussion Thread - by Jamzor the Jaxxor - 09-30-2016, 09:03 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Hadash - 09-30-2016, 09:54 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Nentsia - 09-30-2016, 10:28 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Jamzor the Jaxxor - 10-01-2016, 03:48 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Seperallis - 10-02-2016, 12:59 AM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Jamzor the Jaxxor - 10-02-2016, 01:03 AM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Hadash - 10-02-2016, 01:00 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Seperallis - 10-02-2016, 03:54 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Nentsia - 10-02-2016, 04:25 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Jamzor the Jaxxor - 10-02-2016, 04:25 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Seperallis - 10-02-2016, 09:35 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Nentsia - 10-02-2016, 09:42 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Ceausescu - 10-02-2016, 10:01 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Eminence - 10-03-2016, 01:39 AM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Eminence - 10-03-2016, 01:43 AM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Jamzor the Jaxxor - 10-03-2016, 02:11 AM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Hadash - 10-03-2016, 07:29 AM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Ceausescu - 10-03-2016, 12:19 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Jamzor the Jaxxor - 10-03-2016, 02:28 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Ceausescu - 10-03-2016, 07:45 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Seperallis - 10-03-2016, 09:12 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Eminence - 10-04-2016, 04:43 AM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Jamzor the Jaxxor - 10-04-2016, 02:18 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Jamzor the Jaxxor - 10-03-2016, 02:15 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Jamzor the Jaxxor - 10-03-2016, 08:02 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Ceausescu - 10-03-2016, 08:27 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Severyane - 10-03-2016, 08:05 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Jamzor the Jaxxor - 10-03-2016, 09:23 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Eminence - 10-04-2016, 08:52 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Hadash - 10-04-2016, 05:16 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Severyane - 10-04-2016, 05:30 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Ceausescu - 10-04-2016, 06:12 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Jamzor the Jaxxor - 10-04-2016, 06:19 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Ceausescu - 10-04-2016, 06:37 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Jamzor the Jaxxor - 10-04-2016, 06:45 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Ceausescu - 10-04-2016, 06:50 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Hadash - 10-04-2016, 07:29 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Eminence - 10-04-2016, 08:55 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Jamzor the Jaxxor - 10-04-2016, 09:15 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Eminence - 10-04-2016, 11:05 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Hadash - 10-05-2016, 12:20 AM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Ceausescu - 10-05-2016, 11:51 AM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Eminence - 10-05-2016, 12:41 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Jamzor the Jaxxor - 10-05-2016, 01:58 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Severyane - 10-05-2016, 05:10 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Jamzor the Jaxxor - 10-05-2016, 05:19 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Blacaria - 10-05-2016, 05:16 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Mestra - 10-05-2016, 06:38 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Jamzor the Jaxxor - 10-05-2016, 07:30 PM
RE: NETO Discussion Thread - by Ceausescu - 10-06-2016, 05:31 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 20 Guest(s)
Chat and Sioran News
You can find a more extensive list of stuff that's happened in role play here...if people bothered to add it.

About Eternity RPC

Eternity Role Play Community is a forum and community dedicated to role play. Founded in 2016 as a Modern Tech environment, the community has evolved to include other types of role play and gaming.