+- Eternity RPC Board (http://board.eternityrpc.com)
+-- Forum: Oblivion Compound (http://board.eternityrpc.com/forum-16.html)
+--- Forum: Library of Eternity (http://board.eternityrpc.com/forum-20.html)
+---- Forum: Siora MTRP Archive (http://board.eternityrpc.com/forum-54.html)
+----- Forum: Discussion and Planning (http://board.eternityrpc.com/forum-56.html)
+----- Thread: SBTO Standardisation (/thread-488.html)
SBTO Standardisation - BrumBrum - 06-25-2017
Hey so I'm thinking we really should standardise equipment if we are to work together militarily. So I'm proposing this, we standardise the following main items
Arm:
Guns
Tanks
Infantry vehicles
Artillery
Airforce:
Fighter jets(maybe interceptor and multi-role)
Transport aircraft
Tankers
Radar Aircraft
Navy:
Basically similar standardise each class of ship
In terms of who provides it we should consider carefully. I think the 5 main options are severyenne(Cheap and effective), Taenus(Probably better, also neutral) , Llanlania ,Nyland or Oslanburg
RE: SBTO Standardisation - BrumBrum - 06-25-2017
P.S any people wanting to bid for said contracts can post their jets etc
RE: SBTO Standardisation - BrumBrum - 06-25-2017
![[Image: SBTO%20Base%20network_zps4xzr7sin.jpg~original]](http://i356.photobucket.com/albums/oo8/Havo2/SBTO%20Base%20network_zps4xzr7sin.jpg~original)
This is my proposed network of joint bases.
RE: SBTO Standardisation - Jamzor the Jaxxor - 06-25-2017
My oh my I wonder what this alliance is supposed to be aimed against...
RE: SBTO Standardisation - Arkiania - 06-26-2017
Arkiania can offer you a bulk sale of Leopárdali combat platform. The platform supports MBTs, APCs, IFVs, SPAAs, and support vehicles.
| Type | Heavy APC, SPAA, or CRV |
| In Service | 1575-present |
| Used By | Royal Armed Forces of Arkiania |
| Wars | Octitanian Civil War |
| Designer and Manufacturer | Tavium Military Armaments |
| Unit cost | $3 million approx. ($4 million for MBT) |
| Weight | 60 tonnes |
| Crew | Commander, Driver, Gunner, 9 passengers |
| Main Armament | RCWS with 12.7 mm machine gun or GMG30mm Autocannon2x35mm autocannon(SPAA) |
| Secondary Armament | Smoke grenade dischargers4x AA missiles |
| Engine | 1200hp turbocharged diesel engine |
| Power/weight | 20 hp/ton |
| Suspension | Helical Spring |
| Operation range | 500 km (310 mi) |
| Speed | 60 km/h (40 mph) |
RE: SBTO Standardisation - Ayzek - 06-26-2017
(06-25-2017, 06:56 PM)BrumBrum Wrote:
This is my proposed network of joint bases.
The Hejdar Union states object to this. Many bases are too close to the border which, political fallout aside, comes with the risk of the bases being overrun in a surprise attack far too easily. The Hejdar Union states and Castleon would prefer that bases be located beyond 50km from the border, ideally closer to 100km where possible. Additionally, Freesia objects to hosting so many "unnecessary" bases; it'd rather host up to 1 naval base and 2 army or air force bases.
While they're willing to standardize munitions and logistics standard (the Hejdar Union states already have, and they're very similar to Castleon's), they're a lot less willing to buy equipment they don't believe meet their national requirements, so keep that in mind. They are open to upgrading/updating their infantry arsenal though. Their current main combat rifle has been in service since the 50s.
RE: SBTO Standardisation - BrumBrum - 06-26-2017
(06-26-2017, 02:27 AM)Ayzek Wrote:(06-25-2017, 06:56 PM)BrumBrum Wrote:
This is my proposed network of joint bases.
The Hejdar Union states object to this. Many bases are too close to the border which, political fallout aside, comes with the risk of the bases being overrun in a surprise attack far too easily. The Hejdar Union states and Castleon would prefer that bases be located beyond 50km from the border, ideally closer to 100km where possible. Additionally, Freesia objects to hosting so many "unnecessary" bases; it'd rather host up to 1 naval base and 2 army or air force bases.
While they're willing to standardize munitions and logistics standard (the Hejdar Union states already have, and they're very similar to Castleon's), they're a lot less willing to buy equipment they don't believe meet their national requirements, so keep that in mind. They are open to upgrading/updating their infantry arsenal though. Their current main combat rifle has been in service since the 50s.
Okay so if in those countries we open up the bases 100km from the border and we cut the ammount of bases down a tad.In terms of standardization I believe according to treaty law standardising the equipment is opt in when you want to opt in to a standardisation programme.So its not an issue they choose only to standardise certain equipment or even none. How many bases a country chooses to accept is up to them.
RE: SBTO Standardisation - Flo - 06-26-2017
you literally want to build bases all around carpathia? lol
RE: SBTO Standardisation - Seperallis - 06-30-2017
Why not simply expand the capabilities and capacities of existing bases in each country to accommodate SBTO joint military activities, rather than spending billions duplicating infrastructure? Building an entire military installation is a costly endeavor compared with simply adding a flight line here or a barracks there, unless certain countries are just completely lacking in some military capacity.
Then the question becomes, which bases receive the upgrades and conversions to SBTO military activities.